1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 215 kg more than 2006 Toyota 4Runner.

Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (296 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Fairlane.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Fairlane 2006 Toyota 4Runner
Make Ford Toyota
Model Fairlane 4Runner
Year Released 1982 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4093 cc 3950 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 125 HP 236 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 296 Nm 361 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1185 kg
Vehicle Length 5020 mm 4810 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1920 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2800 mm