1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (296 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Fairlane | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Fairlane | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2908 mm |