1982 Ford Falcon vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1982 Ford Falcon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Falcon (109 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 490 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Falcon | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Falcon | 323 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3271 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2370 mm |
