1982 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 530 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1982 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Falcon (228 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Falcon | 2002 Honda Acty | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | Falcon | Acty |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3271 cc | 660 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2460 mm |
