1982 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision

To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision weights approximately 75 kg more than 1982 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (300 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications: