1982 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Falcon (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Renault Scenic. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 14 kg more than 2005 Renault Scenic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (191 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic.

Compare all specifications: