1982 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Falcon | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Falcon | I-350 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3271 cc | 3458 cc |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3200 mm |
