1982 Ford Falcon vs. 2007 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2007 Holden Commodore is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 251 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Falcon | 2007 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Falcon | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3271 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
