1982 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Fluence (140 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 145 kg more than 2010 Renault Fluence.
Because 1982 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Falcon | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Falcon | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3271 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 140 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2702 mm |
