1982 Ford Granada vs. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Ford Granada is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,269 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Granada (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (108 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Granada should accelerate faster than 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 403 kg more than 1982 Ford Granada.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass (279 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Granada | 1974 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Granada | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 4269 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 219 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1412 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2850 mm |