1982 Ford Granada vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 238 kg more than 1982 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (219 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Granada 1996 Renault Clio
Make Ford Renault
Model Granada Clio
Year Released 1982 1996
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2792 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 150 HP 250 HP
Torque 219 Nm 407 Nm
Top Speed 188 km/hour 250 km/hour
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1412 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2490 mm