1982 Ford Granada vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Granada weights approximately 15 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (151 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Granada | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Granada | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2540 mm |
