1982 Ford Granada vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (119 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Granada | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Granada | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1591 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 119 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3060 mm |