1982 Ford Granada vs. 2004 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (69 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 368 kg more than 1982 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (334 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (148 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Granada | 2004 Nissan Murano | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Granada | Murano |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1738 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 82 L |