1982 Ford Granada vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Granada (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Toyota Celica. (140 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Granada should accelerate faster than 2004 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Granada weights approximately 308 kg more than 2004 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Granada (219 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Toyota Celica. (170 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Granada | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Granada | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 219 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1412 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 55 L |