1982 Ford Granada vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (151 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Granada | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Granada | Colt |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 2972 cc |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2970 mm |
