1982 Ford Granada vs. 2013 Honda Accord
To start off, 2013 Honda Accord is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Accord (182 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (150 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda Accord weights approximately 84 kg more than 1982 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda Accord (247 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Granada | 2013 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Granada | Accord |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 219 Nm | 247 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0 : 1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1412 kg | 1496 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4862 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 65 L |