1982 Ford Laser vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Laser would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Laser (85 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 150 kg more than 1982 Ford Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Laser (120 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (114 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Laser | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Laser | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 114 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2480 mm |