1982 Ford Laser vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Proton 300 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Laser would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Laser (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 300 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1982 Ford Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Laser (120 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Laser | 2000 Proton 300 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Laser | 300 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2450 mm |