1982 Ford Monarch vs. 1998 Acura RL
To start off, 1998 Acura RL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura RL weights approximately 215 kg more than 1982 Ford Monarch.
Because 1982 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura RL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Monarch | 1998 Acura RL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Monarch | RL |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4122 cc | 3472 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2920 mm |
