1982 Ford Monarch vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Monarch weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2003 Jaguar XF has manual transmission. 2003 Jaguar XF will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Monarch | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Monarch | XF |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 7000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1240 mm |