1982 Ford Monarch vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Monarch weights approximately 645 kg more than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1982 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Monarch | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Ford | Smart |
| Model | Monarch | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4122 cc | 1099 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2510 mm |
