1982 Ford Monarch vs. 2008 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda CR-V is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda CR-V weights approximately 73 kg more than 1982 Ford Monarch.
Because 2008 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Monarch. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2008 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 2008 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Monarch | 2008 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Monarch | CR-V |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1533 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2630 mm |