1982 Ford Monarch vs. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet has manual transmission. 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Monarch | 2011 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
Model | Monarch | Cygnet |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |