1982 Ford Monarch vs. 2011 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 132 kg more than 1982 Ford Monarch.
Because 1982 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Monarch | 2011 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | Monarch | Eos |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4122 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1592 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4423 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1444 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2578 mm |
