1982 Ford Mustang vs. 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk

To start off, 1982 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Mustang weights approximately 133 kg more than 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Mustang (407 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk. (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk. 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk has automatic transmission and 1982 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1982 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Mustang 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk
Make Ford Studebaker
Model Mustang Silver Hawk
Year Released 1982 1961
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 3050 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 225 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 111 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 7.8:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1483 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 5190 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 3070 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]