1982 Ford Mustang vs. 1964 Wartburg 312
To start off, 1982 Ford Mustang is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Mustang weights approximately 219 kg more than 1964 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Wartburg 312, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Mustang | 1964 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Ford | Wartburg |
Model | Mustang | 312 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2460 mm |