1982 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 Saturn SL

To start off, 1995 Saturn SL is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Saturn SL (125 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1982 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Saturn SL should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Mustang weights approximately 100 kg more than 1995 Saturn SL.

Because 1982 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Saturn SL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Saturn SL (168 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1995 Saturn SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Mustang 1995 Saturn SL
Make Ford Saturn
Model Mustang SL
Year Released 1982 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2294 cc 1901 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 87 HP 125 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 161 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1185 kg 1085 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1400 mm