1982 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Armada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 819 kg more than 1982 Ford Mustang.
Because 2003 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Mustang | 2003 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Ford | Mahindra |
| Model | Mustang | Armada |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 2004 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4310 mm |
