1982 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Ford C-MAX

To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (104 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Mustang weights approximately 113 kg more than 2004 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Mustang (407 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford C-MAX. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford C-MAX.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Mustang 2004 Ford C-MAX
Make Ford Ford
Model Mustang C-MAX
Year Released 1982 2004
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 225 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6150 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 81.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1483 kg 1370 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2650 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]