1982 Ford Mustang vs. 2006 Isuzu Ascender
To start off, 2006 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu Ascender (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1982 Ford Mustang. (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu Ascender weights approximately 687 kg more than 1982 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Mustang (407 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu Ascender. (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu Ascender.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Mustang | 2006 Isuzu Ascender | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | Mustang | Ascender |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 2170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3280 mm |