1982 Ford Telstar vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1982 Ford Telstar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Humber Pullman (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1002 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Telstar | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Ford | Humber |
| Model | Telstar | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3330 mm |
