1982 Ford Telstar vs. 1997 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1997 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Telstar (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Telstar weights approximately 285 kg more than 1997 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Telstar | 1997 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Ford | ZAZ |
| Model | Telstar | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2330 mm |
