1982 Ford Telstar vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 236 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1982 Ford Telstar has manual transmission. 1982 Ford Telstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Telstar | C 52 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 354 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1266 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2830 mm |