1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 140 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Telstar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Telstar | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |