1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Telstar weights approximately 172 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Telstar (158 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+. (122 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2002 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Telstar | Wagon R+ |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 122 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2340 mm |