1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2004 Lancia Zeta

To start off, 2004 Lancia Zeta is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lancia Zeta (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 570 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lancia Zeta (180 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Ford Telstar 2004 Lancia Zeta
Make Ford Lancia
Model Telstar Zeta
Year Released 1982 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 95 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 158 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 4390 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2520 mm 2830 mm