1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. Both 1982 Ford Telstar and 2004 Renault Scenic are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Telstar (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 674 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Telstar (158 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Telstar | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Telstar | Scenic |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1704 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2750 mm |
