1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Telstar (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Telstar | K2700 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2380 mm |