1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (140 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 70 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Celica (170 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Telstar | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1785 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2510 mm |