1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2008 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2008 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Ranger weights approximately 77 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford Ranger (245 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2008 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Telstar | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2840 mm |