1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2008 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2008 Mazda B2300 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda B2300 (144 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Because 2008 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2008 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Telstar | B2300 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2266 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2840 mm |