1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Telstar | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Ford | Fisker |
| Model | Telstar | Karma |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3160 mm |
