1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 545 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 1982 Ford Telstar has manual transmission. 1982 Ford Telstar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Telstar | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2845 mm |