1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander (226 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2011 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Telstar | Outlander |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4666 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2670 mm |