1982 Ford Telstar vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 265 more horse power than 1982 Ford Telstar. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Telstar | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Telstar | Commodore |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 158 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |