1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1982 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (87 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 536 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Thunderbird | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Thunderbird | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3275 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2290 mm |
