1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1968 Mini MK II

To start off, 1982 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (87 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1968 Mini MK II. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1968 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 826 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mini MK II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (209 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mini MK II. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mini MK II. 1982 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 1968 Mini MK II has manual transmission. 1968 Mini MK II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: