1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1968 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1982 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (87 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 581 kg more than 1968 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Ford Thunderbird | 1968 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Thunderbird | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 3275 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2010 mm |
