1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,275 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo (182 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (87 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 341 kg more than 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Thunderbird. (209 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Thunderbird | 1983 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | Thunderbird | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 3275 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1436 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |